Compiled by Andrew Rilstone (faq@aslan.demon.co.uk)
With input from: Rick Freeman, Douglas Gresham, Sylvia Steiger, M.J.. Logsdon, Penelope Wythes, Anne K Sorknes, and others.
1.1 What is alt.books.cs-lewis?
1.2 What is alt.books.cs.lewis?
1.3 What is appropriate to post to
alt.books.cs-lewis?
1.4 What type of messages are
regarded as inappropriate?
1.5 Is alt.books.cs-lewis a
'Christian' group?
1.6 I don't like the works of Lewis.
Is it okay for me to post here?
1.7 Are there any other on-line
sources of information about C.S Lewis?
1.8 Where can I download the text of
C.S Lewis's books from?
2. Questions about C.S. Lewis and his
life.
2.2 Why was C.S. Lewis known as
'Jack'?
2.4 Who is Walter Hooper? What is his
connection with Lewis?
2.61 What does the title
'Shadowlands' mean?
2.62 Was 'Shadowlands' an accurate
portrayal of Lewis's life?
2.63 Why does Lewis have two stepsons
in the TV version of 'Shadowlands' and only one in the movie?
2.64 Did C.S. Lewis really lose his
faith after the death of his wife?
2.65 What became of David Gresham?
2.7 What biographies have been
written about C.S. Lewis? Are they reliable?
2.8 What C.S. Lewis related sites are
open to the public?
2.9 Why is Magdalen College sometimes
spelt with an 'e' on the end?
3 Questions about C.S. Lewis's
writings
3.1 What did C.S. Lewis write?
3.14 Fiction, Allegory, Imaginative
Works.
3.21 Why is my set of the Narnia
books numbered in the wrong order?
3.23 Are Harper Collins re-publishing
the Narnia books with the Christian element removed.
3.24 Are Harper Collins publishing
"sequels" to the Narnia books. Who is writing them?
3.24 I have an idea for a new Narnia
book. Who should I write to for permission to publish it?
3.25 Is it true that there are
differences in the British and American editions of the Narnia books?
3.26 What film and TV versions of
Lewis's books have there been?
3.27 What's this I hear about a new
movie of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe?
3.28: What is Turkish delight?
3.31: What was The C.S. Lewis Hoax?
3.32 Is Screwtape Proposes a Toast a
sequel to The Screwtape Letters?
3.33 Is there any more posthumous
Lewis material awaiting publication?
3.34 Are there any tapes of Lewis
speaking available?
3.35: Were Lewis's proofs of the
existence of God from 'Miracles' refuted by Elizabeth Anscombe?
3.36: What's this I hear about a new
movie of Out of the Silent Planet
4: Questions about Lewis's Beliefs
4.1 Was Lewis a Roman Catholic?
Didn't he believe in Purgatory?
4.2: What did Lewis think about the
Bible? Was he a fundamentalist?
Alt.books.cs-lewis exists to
discuss anything to do with the life and works of the great English fantasist,
scholar and Christian writer, Clive Staples Lewis.
This seems to be a 'phantom' group that was created by a Usenet gremlin.
There is no point in posting to this group, as all the traffic goes through
alt.books.cs-lewis.
Anything directly related to or arising from Lewis and his works. For
example:
This last rule is more honoured in the breach than the observance: many
people have commented that alt.books.cs-lewis is one of the most interesting
and friendly discussion sites on the net However, on the whole we like to keep
discussion fairly focused on Lewis's life and works; although threads can
wander off the point, we take a dim view of people who start discussion threads
on general issues with no specific Lewis connection. As with any group, lurk
for a few days and you'll get the hang of what is and isn't acceptable.
No. Many contributors to alt.books.cs-lewis belong, like Lewis himself, to
the Christian faith. However, we also receive regular postings from Jews,
atheists, agnostics, new-agers and people who either haven't got any particular
religious affiliation or else don't mention it. Anyone wanting to talk about
Lewis's works is welcome.
We don't like "flamebait" or offensive messages, but we welcome
interesting critiques of Lewis by people who don't like or don't agree with his
works.
On Usenet:
alt.books.inklings:----Discussion about the Oxford literary circle of which
Lewis was a part
alt.fan.tolkien, rec.arts.books.tolkien ----Discussion of the works of
Lewis's friend J.R.R. Tolkien
On the web:
Into the Wardrobe http://cslewis.drzeus.net/
Probably the best starting point for Lewisian web-surfing..
C.S Lewis Mega-Links Page: http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ26.HTM
An exhaustive supply of Lewis related links, as well as a full bibliography
Lewis Common Room: http://www.sonic.net/mary/testo12.htm
A selective archive of alt.books.cs-lewis
This FAQ can be found at http://www.aslan.demon.co.uk/csl.htm
Mailing List
MereLewis is a mailing list dedicated to Jack and his works. To subscribe to
MereLewis, send email to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.AOL.COM, leave the subject line
blank, and in the body type 'subscribe merelewis <name>' with no quotes,
and replace <name> with your name.
The one exception to this is "Spirits in
Bondage", Lewis's 1919 collection of poems, which was placed on some US
public domain websites in 1994 under the old 75 year rule
You are confusing C.S Lewis with that other great English children's author,
Lewis Carrol. Please go away. :)
C.S. Lewis was born in Belfast in 1898. He was educated in England, first at
a prep school that he later likened to a concentration camp, then at Malvern
College and finally by a private tutor. He enlisted in the army in 1917, saw
front-line combat and was wounded at Arras. He returned to his studies after
the war, graduated in 1922 and became a fellow of Magdalen college in 1925. An
atheist in his boyhood, Lewis converted to Christianity in 1931 and became
famous as a result of his wartime religious talks on the BBC, and his
children's books. Lewis was part of the Oxford literary circle known as the
Inklings, whose members also included J.R.R. Tolkien and Charles Williams. In
1957 he married Joy Davidman Gresham, an American with whom he had corresponded
for a number of years. Joy had been a 'Jewish atheist' and a communist; she
converted to Christianity partly as a result of reading Lewis's books. Joy was
already suffering from bone-cancer at the time of their marriage, and died in
1960. Lewis himself died on November the 22nd 1963, the same day that John F.
Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas.
He didn't like the name 'Clive' and as a small child had a pet dog called
Jacksie, which was run over by one of the first cars in Northern Ireland. Jack
decided that from thenceforth he would answer to nothing but 'Jacksie', and
this became 'Jack' in due course. The only person who seems ever to have called
him Clive was William Kirkpatrick, his boyhood tutor.
Janie King Moore was the mother of Paddy Moore, Lewis' closest
comrade-in-arms during the First World War. Lewis reported that the two young
men made a pledge that if either man didn't make it home, the survivor would
take care of Lewis' father and Moore's mother. Paddy Moore died in the war, and
Lewis fulfilled that pledge for years, contributing towards Mrs. Moore's
finances when he was still a poor student and setting up a home with her and
Moore's young sister Maureen when he obtained a teaching position and could
afford one. When her declining health (years later) required professional care,
he faithfully visited the nursing home until she died. Maureen later succeeded
to a Scottish title and became Lady Dunbar of Hempriggs.
The exact nature of Lewis's relationship with Mrs. Moore is not certain:
many readers have surmised that it is connected with the 'enormous emotional
episode' that Lewis refers to in 'Surprised by Joy' but says that he is not at
liberty to write about. Walter Hooper writes that 'The combination of motive,
means and opportunity invites, though it does not demand, the conclusion that
Janie King Moore and C.S. Lewis were lovers.'
Mrs. Moore is sometimes represented as the villain in the story of C.S.
Lewis. Owen Barfield says people have turned her into 'a sort of baleful
stepmother.' Warren Lewis described her relationship with his brother as a
'strange, self- imposed slavery'. On the other hand, George Sayer writes:
'Some of those who have written about C.S. Lewis regard his living with Mrs.
Moore as odd, even sinister. This was not the view of those of us who visited
his home in the thirties. Like his other pupils, I thought it completely normal
that a woman, probably a widow, would make a home for a young bachelor. We had no
difficult accepting her, even when we came to realise that she was not his
mother.'
Walter Hooper is a sort of literary manager to C.S. Lewis Pte. Ltd. He met
Jack briefly in 1963, and has since dedicated his life to bringing Jack's works
before the public. He is originally American but has lived in England for many
years.
Yes, Douglas is the son of Joy Gresham and the stepson of C.S. Lewis; he is
an advisor to the C.S. Lewis literary estate.
Shadowlands was a play depicting Lewis's friendship and marriage to Joy
Davidman Gresham towards the end of his life. There have, to date been four
different versions: a BBC TV play; a stage play; a movie and a radio play.
The play was first mooted way back in 1983 by Brian Sibley and Norman Stone.
Their script, under the title Surprised By Joy, was optioned by a TV company
but was not made. It emerged two years later and was revived by scriptwriter
Bill Nicholson who wrote an entirely new script entitled 'Shadowlands'. This
was released as a TV film directed by Norman Stone, and starring Joss Ackland
and Claire Bloom in 1985.
The piece was then re-written as a stage play and this version starred Nigel
Hawthorne and Jane Lapotaire (who was later replaced by Jane Alexander). It
premiered in London in 1990, and then in New York in 1991.
The movie version was again a re-write by Bill Nicholson, and was released
in 1993. This time it starred Anthony Hopkins and Debrah Winger, and was
directed by Sir Richard Attenborough.
The radio version was transmitted on BBC Radio 4 in 1997, and stuck fairly
closely to the stage version.
At the end of 'The Last Battle', Aslan tells the children that 'you are all
dead, as you used to call it in the Shadowlands': the idea being that the our
world and Narnia are only reflections of Aslan's kingdom. This idea was rather
misunderstood in the movie's screenplay, although it is all in Plato. I wonder
what they do teach in these schools?
No - and it was never supposed to be. It contains many factual inaccuracies:
for example, at the time the film is set, Jack had become a Professor at
Magdalene college Cambridge, a job which would not have involved teaching
undergraduate seminars.
Douglas Gresham says 'In terms of hard facts it is deliberately and by
necessity very inaccurate, but emotionally it is spot on.'
Anthony Hopkins described the movie as 'a fictional illumination based on
the facts.'
As a matter of biographical fact, Joy Gresham had two sons; Douglas and
David, as shown in the TV version of 'Shadowlands'. However, two children
forced the writing of two sets of reactions to events portrayed, and thus two
subplots. This was found to detract from the story, rather than complement it.
Thus in the second version of the piece, the stage play, one child was dropped.
This also meant that producers could hire two child actors rather than four.
This was found to work well and thus was continued into the third version which
was the screenplay.
Some people got this idea from 'Shadowlands', but it is not true, as Lewis's
autobiographical book 'A Grief Observed' makes plain. He did go through a
period of questioning God's goodness, but this seems to have lasted for only a
few hours. ('A Grief Observed' contains a few pages in which Lewis speculates
that God might be wicked, followed by the line 'I wrote that last night. It was
a yell rather than a thought.') One of Lewis's best Christian books - 'Letters
to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer' - was written in the last years of his life,
after Joy had died.
Douglas Gresham says that so far as he knows, his brother, who has embraced
Judaism, is alive and well and living in India with his wife and one son.
There are many, some better than others, including:
Douglas Gresham, Lenten Lands, My Childhood With C.S. Lewis and Joy
Davidman.
A personal account by Lewis's stepson.
William Griffin, CS Lewis - The Authentic Voice
A nice lively read with a lot of quotes from letters, diaries, books, joined up
in a fairly dramatised style
Walter Hooper & Roger Lancelyn Green, CS Lewis: A Biography
An 'official' version by two friends of Lewis.
Walter Hooper, C.S Lewis: A Companion & Guide
Includes a biography, detailed bibliography, overviews of all Lewis's writings,
and guides to the people, places and things associated with his life. Almost
certainly the definitive Lewis reference book.
W.H. Lewis. Memoir of C.S. Lewis
This extended essay, by Lewis's brother, can be found in the Letters of C.S. Lewis.
Walter Hooper described this memoir as 'the best thing ever written about C.S.
Lewis.'
George Sayer Jack: C.S. Lewis and His Times
Part memoir and part biography by a friend and pupil of Lewis. Douglas Gresham
recommends this as the very best biography available.
Brian Sibley Shadowlands
A short biography of Lewis and Joy Davidman, concentrating on the last years.
Note this is not to be confused with the novelisation of the screenplay of the
movie version of 'Shadowlands' which is a every bit as bad as you would expect.
A.N. Wilson C.S. Lewis: A Biography
A well-written, interesting, but highly contentious version.
In the United Kingdom:
Magdalen College, Oxford is often open to public visits in the vacations.
Holy Trinity Churchyard Headington Quarry, Oxford (the site of Jack's grave)
is open.
The Kilns, Lewis's home for many years, is currently under restoration and
may eventually be opened to the public.
The Eagle and Child (the Bird and Baby) where many of the Inklings meetings
were held is open during normal pub opening hours.
In the United States:
Wheaton College in the far western suburbs of Chicago, houses an extensive
collection relating not only to C.S. Lewis, but also to G.K. Chesterton and
Dorothy Sayers. Among its treasures is the original Wardrobe that C.S. Lewis
supposedly had in mind when he wrote the Narnia books. Rick Freeman writes:
'It is very ornate and mysterious looking, as a matter of fact I think the
public T.V. portrayal of Narnia actually used this very one or a replica. The
temptation to wait until no one is looking and just walk into it and see what
would happen was almost overwhelming.'
Magdalen is the Oxford college; Magdalene is the one in Cambridge. Lewis
spent most of his working life as a don at Magdalen, but in 1954 accepted the
post of Professor of Medieval and Renaissance Poetry at Magdalene. In order to
further confuse tourists, the names of both colleges are pronounced 'Mawdlin'.
For a full bibliography, see http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ49.HTM
The Allegory of Love - 1936
A scholarly study of medieval allegory and courtly love.
The Personal Heresy - 1939
A debate with E.W. Tillyard about literary criticism. The 'Penguin Dictionary
of Literary Terms' describes it as 'urbane, courteous and continuously
stimulating; a model of how people should agree to differ in their search after
truth'.
Preface to Paradise Lost - 1942
An introduction to Milton's epic.
The Oxford History of English Literature in the Sixteenth Century, Excluding
Drama - 1954
A text book, regarded as controversial, and nicknamed the 'O Hell!' by Lewis.
Studies in Words - 1960
An analysis of how words have changed their meaning over time.
An Experiment in Criticism - 1961
An attempt to analyse literature from the point of view of the reader.
The Discarded Image - 1964
A description of the medieval world picture.
Plus numerous literary essays, prefaces and reviews.
The Problem of Pain - 1940
Lewis's first attempt to explain why God allows suffering.
The Screwtape Letters - 1942
Lewis's famous series of letters 'from one devil to another'.
Mere Christianity - (As 'Broadcast Talks', 'Christian Behaviour' and 'Beyond
Personality', 1942, 43 & 44: in its present form, 1952.)
The transcripts of the radio talks that made Lewis famous: a simple explanation
of what Christianity is and why an intelligent person can and should believe in
it.
The Abolition of Man - 1943
Lewis's defence of the idea of 'natural law'.
Miracles - 1947
Lewis's exploration of whether miracles can - in theory - ever occur.
Reflections on the Psalms - 1958
A series of -er- reflections on the Psalms.
The Four Loves - 1960
Essays on affection, friendship, erotic love and charity.
Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer - 1964
Devotional letters to an imaginary friend - Lewis's last book.
Christian Reunion
Christian Reflections
Fern Seed and Elephants
First and Second Things
God in the Dock
Of This and Other Worlds
Present Concerns
Screwtape Proposes a Toast
Timeless at Heart
All the above are collections of essays and articles on a wide range of
subjects.
Note that Lewis's wide range of essay have been anthologised in various
editions over the years; the above are the titles of the most recent UK
collections. American readers may find editions under different titles. A
detailed bibliography can be found in Hooper's Companion and Guide.
Poems
This contains 'Spirits in Bondage', Lewis first published work, written before
he was a Christian, and many short poems written at various times during his
life.
Narrative Poems
This includes 'Dymer', the long poem that Lewis wrote as an undergraduate.
The Pilgrim's Regress - 1933
Lewis's first 'religious work' written only a year after his conversion, of
which the book is an allegorical account.
Out of the Silent Planet -1938
Perelandra - 1943
That Hideous Strength - 1945
The so-called 'interplanetary trilogy'; science fiction books, under the
influence of H.G. Wells but with a strong Christian theme.
The first paperback edition of Perelandra was published under the much more
imaginative title of Voyage to Venus in 1953
An abridged paperback edition of That Hideous Strength was published in 1946
under the title The Tortured Planet
The Great Divorce - 1945
Lewis imagines what would happen if a group of damned souls were allowed to
visit heaven. Described by George Sayer as Lewis's most perfect book, a view
with which the writer of this FAQ wholly concurs.
The Narnia Chronicles - 1950-56 (see below)
Lewis's children's tales of Lions, Dragons, Princes and Wardrobes.
Till We Have Faces -1956
A Christian version of the myth of Cupid and Psyche. Lewis's favourite of all
his fiction.
The Dark Tower - 1975
Posthumous fragments, including the abandoned beginning of a fourth book in the
interplanetary trilogy (see below).
Surprised by Joy - 1955
Lewis's account of his childhood and his conversion to Christianity.
A Grief Observed - 1961
The diary which Lewis kept in weeks following the death from cancer of his
wife.
All My Road Before Me - 1991
Lewis's diaries from his undergraduate years
There is an ongoing project to
publish an exhaustive collection
of Lewis's copious correspondence. Only 1 volume has so far been
published:
Collected
Letters of C.S Lewis vol 1 Family Letters
Collected Letters of C.S Lewis
vol 2 The Christian Scholar (forthcoming)
Collected Letters of C.S Lewis
vol 3 Narnia and Joy (forthcoming)
In the meantime, there are a
number of smaller selections:
Letters of C.S. Lewis, edited by Walter Hooper
A sample of Lewis's many correspondences, with excerpts from his diaries and
comments from Warnie.
They Stand Together
The lifelong correspondence between Lewis and his best friend Arthur Greeves.
Letters to an American Lady
Pastoral letters to an anonymous American admirer.
Letters to Children
Lewis's answers to the many young people who wrote to him with questions about
Narnia, Christianity and the craft of writing
There are two ways of numbering the Narnia books. When the American publisher
Macmillan decided to put numbers on their editions they chose to use the order
in which the books were originally published, i.e.:
1. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (1950)
2. Prince Caspian (1951)
3. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (1952)
4. The Silver Chair (1953)
5. The Horse and His Boy (1954)
6. The Magicians Nephew (1955)
7. The Last Battle (1956)
When Harper Collins took over the publication of the books in America, they
decided to keep numbering the books, but on the recommendation of Lewis's
stepson Douglas Gresham, they adopted the order that follows Narnian
Chronology, i.e:
1. The Magicians Nephew
2. The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe
3. The Horse and His Boy
4. Prince Caspian
5. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
6. The Silver Chair
7. The Last Battle
This is also the order followed by the current British editions, published
by Fontana Lions.
A case can be made for both orders. Lewis himself came down in favour of the
chronological order, which is why Douglas Gresham recommended it. In a letter
written in 1957 to an American boy named Laurence, Lewis wrote the following:
'I think I agree with your order {i.e. chronological} for reading the books
more than with your mother's. The series was not planned beforehand as she
thinks. When I wrote The Lion I did not know I was going to write any more.
Then I wrote P. Caspian as a sequel and still didn't think there would be any
more, and when I had done The Voyage I felt quite sure it would be the last.
But I found as I was wrong. So perhaps it does not matter very much in which
order anyone read them. I'm not even sure that all the others were written in
the same order in which they were published.'
So read them in whatever order you like and stop worrying about it!
All readers of Narnia must realise that Aslan the Lion, who is the Son of
the Great Emperor Across the Sea, who breaks the power of the White Witch by
his death and resurrection - and who, as C.S. Lewis pointed out to one of his
young readers 'arrived at the same time as Father Christmas' - is a picture of
Jesus Christ. Does it follow that the books as a whole are allegories?
C.S. Lewis used a very strict definition of the word 'allegory' - after all,
one of his most important academic books was a study of this subject. He wrote
to some Maryland fifth graders in 1954:
'I did not say to myself 'Let us represent Jesus as He really is in our
world by a Lion in Narnia'; I said 'Let us suppose that there were a land like
Narnia and that the Son of God, as he became a Man in our world, became a Lion
there, and then imagine what would happen'.
'The whole series' wrote Lewis in another letter 'works out like this:
The Magician's Nephew tells the Creation and how evil entered Narnia,
The Lion etc. - the Crucifixion and Resurrection,
Prince Caspian - restoration of the true religion after a corruption,
The Horse and His Boy - the calling and conversion of the heathen,
The Voyage of the Dawn Treader - the spiritual life (especially in
Reepicheep),
The Silver Chair - the continuing war against the powers of darkness,
The Last Battle - the coming of Antichrist (the ape). The end of the world
and the last judgement.'
So, in today's loose terminology the books can probably be said to be
'allegorical'. If you want to use that term, then a number of characters might
be said to be allegories:
The White Witch represents the Devil, as does Tash.
Peter represents the valiant and wise Christian.
Reepicheep is the very soul of chivalry with both its virtues and its failings.
'Edmund,' wrote Lewis 'Is, like Judas, a traitor and a sneak. But unlike
Judas he repents and is forgiven (as Judas no doubt would have been if he'd
repented).'
Father Christmas - who gives gifts to Aslan's followers to help them fight
the powers of darkness - may be a picture of the Holy Spirit.
No. This press rumour has been explicitly denied by Lewis's publishers:
Here is an official statement from the publishers:
"The goal of HarperCollins Publishers and the owners and managers of
the C.S. Lewis Estate is to publish the works of C.S.Lewis to the broadest
possible audience, and to leave any interpretation of the works to the reader.
The works of C.S. Lewis will continue to be published by HarperCollins and
Zondervan as written by the author, with no alteration. Zondervan's editorial
standards and Christian mission has not changed in any way."
Harper Collins announced their intention to publish "new" stories
using the Narnia setting. They will not be sequels, but will "fill in the
gaps" in the existing chronology. No authors have been announced, but
Diana Wynne Jones has explicitly denied rumours that she is involved.
Some very minor changes were made to The Lion... and The Voyage... for their
American publication. For example, the name of the witch's agent is changed
from 'Maugrim' to 'Fenris Ulf' and Peter's title from 'Sir Peter Wolfs-Bane' to
'Sir Peter Fenris-Bane.' In the English edition, Aslan says that the Emperor's
magic is written 'in letters as deep as a spear is long on the fire-stones of
the Secret Hill'. In the American he says 'in letters as deep as a spear is
long on the trunk of the world ash-tree.'
The current (1994) Harper Collins American editions have been standardised
with the English versions.
a: 1967 -- The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Black and white TV adaptation, nine twenty-minute episodes, shown on British
ITV.
b: 1979 --The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe
Two one-hour episodes by the Episcopal Radio-TV Foundation of Atlanta and
the Children's Television workshop (creators of Sesame Street and The Electric
Company), animated by Bill Melendez.
Note that when the film was shown in the UK in 1980, the sound-track was
re-recorded with a cast of British actors including Arthur Lowe (Mr Beaver)
June Whitfield (Mrs Beaver) Leo McKern (the Professor) and Steven Thorn
(Aslan.)
c: 1988 -- The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe
Colour, live action version produced by BBC TV. Six thirty-minute episodes.
d: 1989 Prince Caspian/The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
A sequel to the 1988 Lion with many of the same cast. A total of six
thirty-minute episodes.
e: 1990 -- The Silver Chair
The last BBC adaptation to date, a further 6 colour episodes.
The three BBC serials are available on BBC video.
In the late 1990s, Paramount
Pictures bought an option on The Lion… and started to develop a screenplay.
John Boorman was originally scheduled to direct. In the draft script, the
non-Narnian sections of the book were updated to modern Los Angeles. The
children are staying with the Professor in order to avoid an earthquake, rather
than air-raids: in an earlier draft, they were sent away as a punishment
because Edmund had shop-lifted a CD. Other delights apparently included a
Narnian trades-union (ALON: 'Allied Leopards of Narnia) and centaurs that
graze. The first draft evidently had Edmund asking the White Witch, not for
'Turkish Delight' but for 'Cheeseburger and Fries'!
As of spring 1997, John Boorman was replaced by Robert Minskoff as director.
As a result of this, a new script writer was chosen and a new version of the
screenplay produced.
Toward the end of 2001, the option lapsed and has now been acquired by
Walden Media. According to their press-release:
"Walden Media has partnered with The C.S. Lewis Company to produce the
first live-action feature adaptation of the best-selling children’s classic The
Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe. Finding resonance between its educational
mission and the book’s universal themes of truthfulness, loyalty and courage,
Walden has optioned the seven-part fantasy series The Chronicles of Narnia, and
intends to develop it into a franchise. The project will be overseen by Douglas
Gresham, stepson of C.S. Lewis, and Walden Media’s Joel Stillerman, executive
vice president of film & television, and Perry Moore, vice president of
production and development."
The press release goes on to quote Douglas Gresham:
“It has been our dream for many years not simply to make a live-action
version of The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe, but to do so while remaining
faithful to the novel. We are delighted to make this film with Walden Media,
which we are confident will create the adaptation that my stepfather would have
wanted.”
Nothing further is know about cast, likely date of release, script etc.
'Turkish Delight' is a Turkish/Greek sweetmeat ('Rahat Lokoum' in Turkish,
which translates as 'perfumed sweetness') which is made by mixing into a
flavoured solution of sugar in water some wheat or corn starch, so that it
'sets' to a jelly-like consistency. The solution is flavoured with rose water
and may have some portions of chopped nuts suspended in it.
When the whole thing solidifies it is cut into blocks about 1' cube, and
dusted with a coating of icing sugar (powdered sugar). It is served after meals
as an accompaniment to the tiny cups of (usually very sweet) Greek/Turkish
coffee they drink in the region.
The sort sold in English sweet shops is rather softer and less chewy than
the authentic Turkish sweet: you can also get a chocolate coated candy-bar
'Fry's Turkish Delight' which is almost completely unlike the real thing.
In England, it is commonly bought at Christmas, which may be why it was the
first sweet that Edmund thought of in the snow covered Narnian forest.
The C.S. Lewis Hoax was a book by Kathryn Lindskoog published in 1988. It
directed a number of allegations at Walter Hooper and the C.S. Lewis estate:
most notably that Hooper had lied about rescuing unpublished works by Lewis
from a bonfire; that he had exaggerated the length and intimacy of his
friendship with Lewis; and that some of Lewis's minor posthumous works,
including The Dark Tower and two of the essays in Boxen are not by Lewis at
all, but forgeries by Walter Hooper.
It does seem to be a fact that Hooper only worked with Lewis for a period of
a few weeks in 1963 (this fact is agreed by all Lewis's biographers) and not
the 'many years' claimed in some dust jacket blurbs.
In 1995, forensic document examiner Nancy H. Cole of Palo Alto, CA compared
the MS of the Dark Tower and other contested works with known examples of
Lewis's and Hooper's handwriting. Although it is true that Hooper's handwriting
is very similar to Lewis's, Cole lists six characteristics which the Dark Tower
shares with the Lewis texts, but not with the Hooper samples. Therefore, in her
professional opinion, the Dark Tower is certainly written by Lewis. She
concludes:'There is no base to the charge that Walter Hooper has forged these
documents, and he is deserving of apology.'
Cole's credibility as a handwriting analyst has been callled into question
by Kathryn Lindskoog's. Her side of the argument can be found on the web at: http://www.niu.edu/acad/english/krm/lewis.html
Not exactly. Screwtape Proposes a Toast is a separate essay in which
Screwtape gives a speech praising recent developments in the English education
system. This is one essay in the collection entitled Screwtape Proposes a
Toast.
There will eventually be a complete Letters of C.S. Lewis to replace the
present one volume selection. There is also some unpublished poetry.
The five essays that make up The Four Loves were originally radio talks
commissioned by the Episcopal Radio and Television Foundation of Atlanta
Georgia in 1957. (They were not very widely broadcast, supposedly because the
Foundation thought that audiences might be shocked by the fact that Lewis
'several times brought sex into his talk on Eros') These talks are available on
audio cassette from the Foundation.
The foundation has published two other cassettes of Lewis speaking. One,
entitled C.S Lewis: Comments and Critiques contains a number of Lewis' BBC
broadcasts: his preface to The Great Divorce; a talk on Charles Williams; a
talk on The Pilgrim's Progress; and perhaps most excitingly a version of his
inaugural lecture at Cambridge.
Sadly, only one of the wartime talks that Lewis gave on the BBC and which
later became Mere Christianity seems to have survived. This is the chapter
entitled 'The New Men' from the final section of the book. The Foundation's
1982 tape of Michael York reading Mere Christianity also included this precious
recording. However, this tape is no longer available.
On 2nd February 1948, Elizabeth Anscombe read a paper criticising the third
chapter of C.S Lewis's Miracles to the Oxford Socratic Club.
Anscombe was a student of Wittgenstein, a student of philosophy but also a
convert to Catholicism. At the Socratic Club debate, she argued against Lewis's
position: she was not attacking his faith, but the philosophical validity of
his argument. Lewis must have accepted the criticisms, since he later rewrote
the chapter: changing the title from 'Naturalism is Self-Refuting' to the less
ambitious 'The Cardinal Difficulty of Naturalism.'
According to George Sayer, Lewis's friend and biographer, Lewis regarded the
debate as a defeat, and felt humiliated by it.
'He told me that he had been proved wrong, and that his argument for the
existence of God had been demolished....The debate had been a humiliating
experience, but perhaps it was ultimately good for him. In the past, he had
been are too proud of his logical ability. Now he was humbled....'I can never
write another book of that sort' he said to me of 'Miracles.' And he never did.
He also never wrote another theological book. 'Reflections on the Psalms' is
really devotional and literary; 'Letters to Malcolm' is also a devotional book,
a series of reflections on prayer, without contentious arguments.'
Derek Brewer goes even further, saying that Lewis recalled the meeting
"with real horror" was "deeply disturbed by it" and
described it in terms of "the retreat of infantry thrown back under heavy
attack."
On the other hand, the minutes of the Socratic Club do not report such a
dramatic and humiliating defeat, merely recording that:
'In general it appeared that Mr. Lewis would have to turn his argument into
a rigorous analytic one, if his motion were to stand the test of all the
questions put to him'.
Anscombe herself did not remember 'humiliating' or 'defeating' Lewis. She
wrote:
'The fact that Lewis rewrote that chapter, and rewrote it so that it now has
those qualities, shows his honesty and seriousness. The meeting of the Socratic
Club at which I read my paper has been described by several of his friends as a
horrible and shocking experience which upset him very much. Neither Dr Harvard
(who had Lewis and me to dinner a few weeks later) nor Professor Jack Bennet
remembered any such feelings on Lewis's part... My own recollection is that it
was an occasion of sober discussion of certain quite definite criticisms, which
Lewis's rethinking and rewriting showed he thought was accurate. I am inclined
to construe the odd accounts of the matter by some of his friends - who seem
not to have been interested in the actual arguments of the subject-matter - as
an interesting example of the phenomenon called projection'.
We understand that a film option has been taken on this book, but the
project is in its infancy and no further details are known.
Lewis was not a Catholic. He was and remained an Anglican (Church of
England) for his post-conversion life, describing himself as 'neither
particularly 'high', nor particularly 'low' '. He was critical of some specific
aspects of the Catholic faith - memorably commenting that if the Virgin Mary is
like the best of human mothers, she doesn't want attention directed at herself
instead of her Son! On the other hand, in Letters to Malcolm and elsewhere, he
defends the idea of Purgatory as a necessary 'cleaning up time' for the soul
before entering the company of heaven - although he acknowledged that the
doctrine was open to abuse.
'I hope' he writes 'that when the tooth of life is drawn and I am coming
round, a voice will say 'Rinse your mouth out with this.' This will be
purgatory.'
In the essay Christian Reunion he states that the real disagreement between
Catholics and Protestants is not about any particular belief, but about the
source and nature of doctrine and authority:
'The real reason I cannot be in communion with you is... that to accept your
Church means not to accept a given body of doctrine but to accept in advance
any doctrine that your Church hereafter produces'.
When Lewis was working on Mere Christianity, he had Book II vetted by
Anglican, Roman Catholic, Methodist and Presbyterian clergymen, to avoid any
hint of denominational bias creeping in. In a telling passage in Allegory of
Love he recognises the potential flaws in both the Catholic and the Protestant
paths:
'When Catholicism goes bad it becomes the world-old, world-wide religio of
amulets and holy places and priest craft; Protestantism, in its corresponding
decay, becomes a vague mist of ethical platitudes.'
Here we again run into semantic difficulties, what is meant by
'fundamentalist'? Lewis did believe that the Bible was the word of God, but he
also believed that we were given our minds to use them.
In his Reflections on the Psalms Lewis says:
'At one point I had to explain how I differed on a certain point from both
Catholics and Fundamentalists: I hope I shall not for this forfeit the goodwill
or the prayers of either. Nor do I much fear it.'
The 'certain matter' is, again, the source of authority: although he regards
much of the Bible as being the historical truth, he cannot regard it as a
source of absolute certainty, as fundamentalists do.
His two most sustained discussions of the Bible are 'Fern Seed and Elephants' (an essay in the collection of the same title) and the chapter 'Scripture' in Reflections on the Psalms.